Saturday, September 23, 2006

Feist - Some excellent live videos

Ahh, You tube.

Really good quality videos below:

Secret Heart

Mushaboom

Major Label Debut - actually a BSS tune

The Alberta Leadership Race Is Underway

Ralph Klein is gone. Well, sort of anyhow. He filed his letter of resignation, did departure interviews with both major Canadian networks and described his departure as "Business as Usual" to Rex Murphy. In recent times, many people have suggested that King Ralph really didn't have much of an idea how to run a government awash in cash. Articles were written, the Liberals hounded the government... "How could it be?". Interestingly, in traditional and well documented Ralph fashion he simply admitted "We weren't prepared!". Wow. How on earth do you argue with that?

Prepared. Are Albertans prepared for the leadership contest that is to come? Better question, are Canadians prepared for what some of the hopefuls have to offer vis a vis Provincial-Federal relations? The platforms of the contenders haven't made much news recently. I find that a little odd considering the departure of Alberta's 14 year veteran premier. The absence of reporting is even more remiss given the hard right turn the Alberta Progressive Conservative Party is going to take come December - regardless of who wins.

Three widely acknowledged frontrunners - Lyle Oberg, Jim Dinning and Ted Morton - have all identified (using different terms, of course) "Protecting Alberta's resources from federal intrusion" as key parts of thier platforms. Ted Morton, in fact, wrote a key document that many people may be familiar with - It isn't unimportant to mention here that current PM Stephen Harper co-wrote it (as did Tom Flanagan and three others). The "Alberta Agenda" or better known by it's reviled MSM title "The Alberta Firewall" proposed the immediate establishment of an Alberta Pension Plan and establishment of an Alberta Provincial Police Force when the current RCMP contract runs out in 2012 (just to name two). Morton, a reknowned constitutional expert and (just incidentally) an ELECTED Alberta senator in waiting, is also, perhaps unsurprisingly still planning to push through some legislation to protect the clergy and teachers by allowing them to refuse to perform same sex marriages or teach "same sex" values to students if it is against thier religious beliefs. This is groundbreaking by the way - The Bill actually protects the rights of a majority in Alberta all the while not going against the Charter of Rights. In fact, if he is elected and passes the bill it would be the first such "majority" protection ever afforded and entrenched in a Human Rights Code.

Morton, it should be said, was the ONLY member of caucus who opposed the Prosperity Bonus cheques handed out by the Alberta government.

Now, many people might think Alberta pulling out of the CPP isn't a big deal - after all Quebec has had it's own pension plan for years. Think about this - Alberta has the highest (nearly 25% higher) average household income in Canada (excluding the territories) - it is indeed among the top three jurisdictions in North America - and the youngest population. What do those two factors mean? Think about it this way: The 25 year old making 120,000 dollars a year will pay into the CPP for at least 30 more years. The average age in Alberta is so low, in fact, that this proposed APP would allow for some pretty risky investing by the managers - still allowing generally higher rates of return. There are less people collecting CPP benefits in Alberta than there are in Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Nova Scotia - combined. This young pool of workers, coupled with the highest birth rates in Canada and the highest rate of immigration for those under 30, means Alberta would enjoy a Pension Plan with more flexibility and new income than even the venerable Ontario Teachers Pension fund. The best part? The government could legislate that ALL funds in the APP go towards business and investment in Alberta. (Just like Quebec does with the QPP)

As for the establishment of an Alberta Provincial Police Force, what effects would this have? First, you must consider that Alberta established thier own highway patrol officers just this Labour Day weekend. (If there is a message within this, it's probably that Alberta intends non-renewal of the RCMP contract in 2012). There are currently 2,000 or so RCMP officers working in Alberta. Granted, they're not all working the "beat" but even if just 1,000 of them are (which I think is reasonable) where will they go to work in 2012? Will they quit? Or, perhaps more likely, will they be well compensated by a provincial government flush with cash and simply join the newly established force? Consider this - RCMP officers are, as a matter of fact, quite well paid. Though a corporal can make 65K as an RCMP officer after about 5 years of service, consider that a Calgary Police Service officer with the same 5 years experience is making a shade under 70K (they offer CASH bonuses to qualified officers who join as well). In short, why will the RCMP lose officers to a new Alberta police force? They get paid better, will likely (if the CPS is any example) get a hefty cash incentive, and don't have to be worried about postings to Inuvik, Churchill or, god forbid, Surrey.

The Firewall concept, it must be stated again, is endorsed by all three leading candidates in the Alberta PC leadership race.

When asked, "Does having a federal conservative government make you rethink the firewall idea?", Ted Morton replied,

"There won't be a federal conservative government forever"

Watch out Canada - the most powerful economic machine in North America is having a leadership race - and they're not looking back.

Wednesday, September 13, 2006

Retention Issues

For those of you unaware, a great site called http://army.ca exists and has some really great threads dealing with all aspects of life in the Canadian Forces (including the navy!). A recent thread got my attention regarding some current issues affecting our "reserve force" fleet. It's quite a read, but I strongly encourage all of you, both civvie and navy, to check it out:

http://forums.army.ca/forums/index.php/topic,47912.0.html

As well - here is a VERY cool piece on the Navy that will probably never see airtime. Too bad, i think it's the best produced thing to come out of Ottawa since the Liberal attack ads about Soldiers in our cities (gasp!)

Domestic Security Video

Saturday, September 09, 2006

The NDP convention - Does anyone REALLY care?

News Flash - The New Democratic Party of Canada is having a policy convention. There are good odds that you haven't heard of it yet. In fact, short of the recent acceptance of the policy to have Canada's troops pull out immediately from Afghanistan you probably have no idea what sorts of plans and policies the Dippers really have. Of course, all wasn't especially good at the beginning of the Convention - oh no - apparently some people disagree that the NDP should run on a platform of anti-capitalist, pro socialist doctrine. Now that Layton has effectively destroyed the long standing partnership his party had with Organized Labour who actually votes for these guys?

I mean, of course, besides students and other stereotypical lovers of the "great socialist machine" (teachers, environmentalists, etc.). Some people really do like thier policies. They speak to geniune needs in Canada - more taxes, less free enterprise and certainly bigger, more intrusive government. In the last election, 17.5% of Canadians who actually bothered to go out and vote put a tick in the column of their favourite NDP candidate. Isn't that wonderful?

Basically, what this means is ALMOST one out of five people you pass on the street voted for the NDP (depending on your riding of course - in some places you'd run into many more - like BC, err the "lower mainland and the island" for example). One out of five! You are just as likely to run into a person without a college or university education. There really isn't a point to be made here.

Funny, the NDP never really did well when they won majority governments. Bob Rae, who now wants to lead the federal Liberals (ummm... what?) ran the province of Ontario into the ground. It's an important statement that. If you still hold on to the idea that the Liberal leadership race is relevant consider the fact that Bob Rae, generally disliked and much maligned in Ontario, is one of the forerunners to be leader. Ha! Ralph Klein would have had better luck getting votes in Ontario after his infamous "bums and creeps" speech. Then of course there is BC, which had it's own run-in with an NDP majority. BC became a have not province under that government - by the way. We also (the taxpayers of BC) bought some very nice fast catamaran ferries. They were then sold for a mere fraction of thier cost to the same company who built them. If you'd like to see a billion dollars rusting (and this is odd considering the aluminum construction), feel free to take a tour of the North Vancouver facilities of the Washington Marine Group.

The real only "success" for the NDP has been Saskatchewan. Things seemed to be going well, it remained a have not province and lost nearly 17% of it's population in the process. 17%. That means nearly one on five people left Saskatchewan during the reign of the "great" NDP government of Roy Romanow. (Rather, the Honourable Roy Romanow). Saskatchewan is now a have province again - perhaps there is a sign of life for the NDP after all?

I'll be honest - I don't like the NDP. I don't care for their policies, and I don't care for the "vision" they have started to form at this convention. That shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone, but consider this, a draft resolution from the convention floor included the idea that Canadian troops in Afghanistan were "acting like terrorists".

Thanks for the vote of confidence my Dipper friends.